The Anglican Examiner
Illuminating Religion and Public Affairs Around the World    
Seeing
Christ
In
Human
Rights
The Anglican Examiner, Copyright by Donn Mitchell, 2010
Participate in this global forum here.
Learn how purchases from this
site support human rights.
Learn
how to
stop it.
$17.95
Home
Seeing Christ
In Human Rights
The New York Anglicans
Eleanor Roosevelt,
Mary Harriman Rumsey,
Francis Perkins, and
Other Public Figures
Careers in Theological
Education
Christian Witness in
Investments
Contact Us
Archive
When Rights Are Not Right
Lambeth Reflections:  Of Apostles and Appeasement
Rebuilding Communion:  Who Pays the Price?
Dogma Rarely the Cause of Religious Conflict, Experts Say
International Coalition of Investors Calls for Labor Law Reform in U.S.
Breaking the Gender Barrier in New York's Blue Collar Trades:  Sisters in the Brotherhoods
The Church and Labor
(coming soon)
...and show us a
vision of a world
made new.
Eleanor
Roosevelt's
Nightly Prayer
Julia Cameron
on perserverance.
$14.95
Advice from the former
director of Episcopal
Relief and Development.

$24.00
Final Draft of Covenant Text
Proposes Anglican "Curia"
Still a Power Grab
By Donn Mitchell
Editor,
The Anglican Examiner
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
February "Seeing Christ" Discussion
Focuses on Article Two: Equality
The discussion poses the following questions:

When you think of your experience of Jesus—in scripture, tradition,
reason, and spiritual experience:  
  —What suggests that we are entitled to freedom?
  —What evidence do we have that Jesus makes no distinctions of the
kind listed above?
  —Are there distinctions Jesus rejects that are not mentioned above?
In your view, does the language of Article 2 of the Declaration:
  —Limit the forms of discrimination that should be rejected?
  —Apply only to governments or nation-states?

A total of nine thoughtful Christians have already considered these
questions and posted their responses
here.  Readers of The Anglican
Examiner
are invited to reflect on these comments and offer their own
insights and/or pose additional questions.

Participate in "Seeing Christ in Human Rights" here.
Church of England Challenge
To U.K. Equality Bill Assailed
In an article in Britain’s influential Guardian, Savitri
Hensman has assailed the Church of England’s challenge
to the government’s proposed Equality Bill.  Hensman, a
Sri Lankan woman living in the United Kingdom, is a
widely published human rights activist.
Church of England bishops, Hensman asserts, “have
been energetic in resisting attempts to clarify equality law
in line with the European Union's requirements and what
many would regard as basic decency.”  Noting that
churches are already permitted to discriminate on various
bases in matters of ordination, she said senior church
leaders had become concerned that faith-based
organizations “might not have enough freedom to exclude
those who do not fit their ‘guiding doctrine and ethos’”,
describing it as a step backwards from earlier church
positions.

The bill, which has been blocked in the House of Lords,
was introduced by the government of Prime Minister
Gordon Brown in response to a European Commission
directive to bring the United Kingdom’s equality laws into
closer conformity to the standards of the European Union.
Read the
complete story here.

Savitri Hensman is a participant in The Anglican
Examiner’s discussion, “Seeing Christ in Human
Rights.”  You can read her comments on Article One of
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
here.
The month of February begins with the celebration of Candlemas
(February 2), formally known as the Feast of the Presentation of Our
Lord.  A major feature of the liturgy is the blessing of candles and a
procession signifying the first entry of Christ—the Light of the World,
into the Temple at Jersusalem.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in
this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race,
colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion,
national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the
political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or
territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent,
trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of
sovereignty.
In the final draft text of the proposed Anglican
Communion Covenant, even the Church of England “by
law established” could be “suspended” if a Standing
Committee of the Anglican Consultative Council and the
Primates’ Meeting deems a particular action
“incompatible” with the covenant.

While devoting the bulk of its text to affirmations of
diversity, plurality, and provincial autonomy, the final text
of the proposed covenant still creates a disciplinary
mechanism that will give an elite group unprecedented
power to sanction, discipline, and exclude member
churches for taking actions (or making prophetic
witness) deemed “controversial” by people who object to
such actions or witness.

Section 4.2.5 allows the Standing Committee to request a
church to defer a controversial action or face “relational
consequences.”  The Standing Committee can deem an
action “controversial” regardless of how much support it
has in the “offending” church, even if failing to take the
action would violate local canon or civil law.

No provision is made for determining whether the views
of primates, councilors, and standing committee
members accurately represent the
consensus fidelium in
their own provinces.  Their voices would have equal
weight regardless of the size of their provinces, which
range from 12,000 to 25,000,000 baptized.

Read the complete draft text
here.
In an effort to shine the
light of Christ on human
rights,
The Anglican
Examiner’s
 on-going
discussion, “Seeing Christ
in Human Rights,” will
devote February's
discussion to Article Two
of the Universal
Declaration of Human
Rights.

The text of Article Two
reads: